On October 21, 2025, former U.S. President Donald Trump revealed that several Middle Eastern allies had expressed willingness to deploy military forces into Gaza to confront Hamas, contingent upon his request. However, Trump stated that he had opted to delay such action, offering Hamas “one more chance” to comply with the ceasefire agreement. He emphasized that if Hamas continues to violate the terms, the response from allied forces would be “fast, furious, and brutal.”
i24NEWS
+1

Allied Support and Conditional Deployment

Trump’s assertion indicates a significant level of support from regional allies for potential military intervention in Gaza. While specific countries were not named, reports suggest that nations such as Indonesia, Azerbaijan, and Pakistan have been in discussions about contributing troops to a future international stabilization force in Gaza. These nations have shown interest in supporting and training Palestinian police forces, with guidance from Egypt and Jordan. The proposed force aims to assist in the demilitarization and reconstruction of Gaza, contingent upon Hamas’s disarmament and adherence to the peace plan.
Politico

U.S. Military Presence and Strategic Considerations

Despite the offers from allied nations, the United States has refrained from sending its own troops into Gaza. Instead, the U.S. has deployed 200 personnel to a civil-military coordination center in Israel, focusing on logistical support and coordination efforts. This approach reflects a strategic decision to involve regional partners in the stabilization process while maintaining a supportive role without direct military engagement.
Politico

Diplomatic Efforts and Ongoing Negotiations

In parallel with military considerations, diplomatic efforts continue to address the underlying issues in Gaza. U.S. officials, including Vice President JD Vance, have arrived in Israel to engage with Israeli leaders and discuss the next phases of the peace plan. The focus remains on ensuring the ceasefire holds, facilitating humanitarian aid, and working towards the establishment of a transitional authority in Gaza. However, challenges persist, particularly concerning Hamas’s disarmament and the formation of a governance structure that excludes the militant group.
Financial Times

Conclusion

President Trump’s decision to delay military intervention in Gaza underscores the complex interplay between diplomatic negotiations and military readiness in conflict resolution. While regional allies have expressed support for action against Hamas, the emphasis remains on diplomatic solutions and adherence to the ceasefire agreement. The coming days will be critical in determining whether Hamas will comply with the terms, and if not, how the international community will respond to ensure stability in the region.